IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v10y1978i02p43-48_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Risk Programming Analysis of Cattle Procurement by Beef Packers

Author

Listed:
  • Raikes, Ronald
  • Sieck, Gail M.
  • Miller, Katherine S.

Abstract

Producers and processors of many agricultural commodities can choose from among several coordination arrangements including spot-market exchange, contractual arrangements, and vertical integration. Firm decisions about coordination arrangements are important because they affect the success or even the survival of the firm and also cause broader impacts. The choice of marketing arrangements will influence a firm's profitability through prices received or paid, quality premiums or discounts, marketing costs incurred, exposure to production or price risk, and perhaps capital requirements. These firm decisions may have repercussions throughout the industry. For example, decisions by processing firms to shift from spot purchases to contract purchases may effectively foreclose the opportunity for producers to make spot sales. Decisions by processors to vertically integrate into production may force specialized producers out of business by limiting their marketing alternatives. Firm decision models focusing on choices among coordination arrangements should be helpful for prescribing and predicting firm behavior, predicting trends in relative importance of alternative arrangements, and evaluating policies (e.g., laws prohibiting processor ownership of production facilities) that are designed to influence these trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Raikes, Ronald & Sieck, Gail M. & Miller, Katherine S., 1978. "A Risk Programming Analysis of Cattle Procurement by Beef Packers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 43-48, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:10:y:1978:i:02:p:43-48_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200014357/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Musser, Wesley N. & Shurley, W. D. & Williams, F. W., 1980. "An E-V Analysis of Beef Calf Backgrounding Systems in Georgia," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 37-42, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:10:y:1978:i:02:p:43-48_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.