Author
Listed:
- van der Hulst, Frank J. P.
- Prins, Berdien A.
- Brabers, Anne E. M.
- Timans, Rob
- de Jong, Judith D.
Abstract
Background: Health insurers’ role in healthcare systems based on managed competition comprises various tasks. Misconceptions about these tasks may result in low public trust, which may hamper health insurers in performing their tasks. This study examines the relationship between enrollees’ perceptions of health insurers’ tasks and their trust in them. Methods: A questionnaire in November 2021 asked respondents to indicate to what extent health insurers have to perform certain tasks, whether they actually perform them, and whether they think these tasks are important. Trust was measured using a validated multiple-item scale. The results from 837 respondents (56 per cent response rate) were analysed using multivariate regression models. Results: A larger mismatch between enrollees’ expectations about health insurers’ tasks and their actual statutory tasks is related to less trust regarding the categories ‘controlling healthcare costs’ and ‘mediation and quality of care’. Second, a larger mismatch between expectations and actually performed tasks is related to less trust for all categories. Importance of tasks only affects this relationship concerning ‘informing about price and availability of care’. Conclusions: This study emphasises the importance of reducing enrollees’ misconceptions as trust in health insurers is necessary to fulfil their role as purchaser of care.
Suggested Citation
van der Hulst, Frank J. P. & Prins, Berdien A. & Brabers, Anne E. M. & Timans, Rob & de Jong, Judith D., 2026.
"The relationship between enrollees’ perceptions of health insurers’ tasks and their trust in them,"
Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 80-104, January.
Handle:
RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:80-104_6
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:80-104_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.