IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v21y2026i1p54-79_5.html

Do consumers perceive and trust health insurers within a system of managed competition as prudent buyers of care?

Author

Listed:
  • Stolper, Karel C. F.
  • Yildirim, Izel
  • Boonen, Lieke H. H. M.
  • Schut, Frederik T.
  • Varkevisser, Marco

Abstract

In health care systems based upon the principles of managed competition, health insurers are expected to act as prudent buyers of care. Consumers are expected to switch between insurers based upon the performance of insurers in this role. Yet, the Dutch experience shows that trust of consumers in health insurers is low and that switching consumers focus primarily on price. The question arises if consumers do in fact perceive and trust insurers as prudent buyers of care. We addressed this question by using a mixed-method approach. The results show that most people know that insurers buy health care and feel that the purchasing tasks suit their role. They even have reasonable, though fragile, trust in the purchasing competencies of the insurer. However, the results also revealed that consumers have insufficient information to cast a judgement about insurers as purchasers and incorrectly think that insurers are commercial organisations. Hence, improving the public information about insurers and their purchasing role seems to be crucial. Given the inherent complexity in the system, it remains to be seen if this objective can be reached in the (near) future. For that reason, policymakers should also consider additional measures to encourage that insurers will take integral purchasing responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Stolper, Karel C. F. & Yildirim, Izel & Boonen, Lieke H. H. M. & Schut, Frederik T. & Varkevisser, Marco, 2026. "Do consumers perceive and trust health insurers within a system of managed competition as prudent buyers of care?," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 54-79, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:54-79_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133124000185/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:54-79_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.