IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v20y2025i1p64-84_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Just informal patient payments are not enough, ‘personal connections’ and knowledge of the ‘rules’ are also required: a logistic regression analysis of informal practices in health care in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Levenets, Olena
  • Stepurko, Tetiana
  • Polese, Abel
  • Pavlova, Milena
  • Groot, Wim

Abstract

In Ukraine, patients and their family members face numerous barriers to health care services. In response, they use coping strategies, that are manifold and complex activities aimed at overcoming these barriers, the financial burden of the treatment, and the poor quality of health care services. These activities include formal and informal practices. Based on representative survey data from 2015 (N = 2,022), we identify patterns in the use of coping strategies, specific coping strategies used to secure good quality consultation and treatment, and analyse opinions and actions towards coping practices. We further analyse the factors associated with the last experience of coping and look at patterns of connection building. We find that the chances of using both money and connection as a coping strategy are higher for people with incomplete higher and highest levels of education. The size of this effect increases with the level of education. Older people, people with better health, and people with a higher opinion of the state use informal practices less, while women are more active in developing connections. The closer the relationship is with a medical doctor, the higher is the chance that such connection will be used in case of health service consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Levenets, Olena & Stepurko, Tetiana & Polese, Abel & Pavlova, Milena & Groot, Wim, 2025. "Just informal patient payments are not enough, ‘personal connections’ and knowledge of the ‘rules’ are also required: a logistic regression analysis of informal practices in health care in Ukraine," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 64-84, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:64-84_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133124000215/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:64-84_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.