IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v16y2021i1p51-63_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neither protective nor harmonized: the crossborder regulation of medical devices in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Jarman, Holly
  • Rozenblum, Sarah
  • Huang, Tiffany J.

Abstract

To what extent does inadequate market regulation contribute to poor health outcomes? A series of prominent scandals involving harmful medical devices has made improving the regulation of these devices an urgent problem for the European Union (EU). This is, however, a specific example of a general phenomenon. The EU remains first and foremost a large and integrated market within which the EU institutions have considerable regulatory authority. Even if there is little EU commitment to a health or social policy agenda, its use of that regulatory authority shapes health care cost and quality and should be understood as health policy. We use data from EU-level and national policy documents to analyse the EU's current regulatory framework for medical devices and assess its likely future efficacy. Despite revising the medical devices directive to require more stringent pre-authorization requirements for high-risk medical devices and improvements in post-market surveillance, the key underlying problems of market fragmentation and patient safety persist. Without strong and consistent support for the implementation of the new directive, the likely result is the status quo, with significant consequences for health in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarman, Holly & Rozenblum, Sarah & Huang, Tiffany J., 2021. "Neither protective nor harmonized: the crossborder regulation of medical devices in the EU," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 51-63, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:16:y:2021:i:1:p:51-63_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133120000158/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:16:y:2021:i:1:p:51-63_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.