IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/fihrev/v23y2016i02p245-271_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The openness of the London Goldsmiths’ Company in the second half of the seventeenth century: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Schwarzberg, Raphaelle

Abstract

In this article, we analyse geographical, occupational and kinship ties amongst apprentices and their masters of the London Goldsmiths’ Company in the second half of the seventeenth century, at a time when the profession was undergoing radical change, thus forming the cradle of British banking. Systematic comparisons of social capital of the guild's two subgroups (the ‘Bankers’ and the ‘Craftsmen and Retailers’) show few such ties at entry and only slightly more amongst office-holders. Overall, ‘Bankers’ display slightly greater social ties in the company overall. Hypotheses for such patterns are discussed, including activity specificity, wealth and position in the guild and households’ economic strategies. The article calls for a household-based approach to economic choices as opposed to one focusing on the guild.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwarzberg, Raphaelle, 2016. "The openness of the London Goldsmiths’ Company in the second half of the seventeenth century: an empirical study," Financial History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 245-271, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:fihrev:v:23:y:2016:i:02:p:245-271_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0968565016000056/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:fihrev:v:23:y:2016:i:02:p:245-271_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/fhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.