IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v4y1996i04p329-332_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Up and down scalar levels: reductionism or infinite fractal complexity in biology?

Author

Listed:
  • Lüttge, Ulrich

Abstract

Systems studied by science are generally characterized by a hierarchy of levels with different dimensions. Continuous moving up and down these scalar levels is needed for understanding. In biology, the science of the very complex, application of simple general rules is rarely—if ever—sufficient. Thus, conceptual reductionism is not possible As in fractals, where scaling does not affect the structures emerging, similar extraordinary complexity appears on each scalar level. Thus, scaling down is not reductionism. The need for continuous scaling up and scaling down not only requires integration of specialists but also reincarnation of generalists.

Suggested Citation

  • Lüttge, Ulrich, 1996. "Up and down scalar levels: reductionism or infinite fractal complexity in biology?," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 329-332, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:4:y:1996:i:04:p:329-332_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S106279870000209X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:4:y:1996:i:04:p:329-332_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.