IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v29y2021i6p794-804_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Solidarity and Encouraging Shared Commitment: Chongqing Daily’s Narratives about the Front-line Workers and the Role of these Narratives in Containing Covid-19

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zou

Abstract

This article analyses Chongqing Daily’s narratives about the front-line workers during the pandemic outbreak and their role in containing the Covid-19. These narratives foreground the disruption of filial connections and family life of those on the front lines as well as the physical toll their work takes on the bodies of these workers. By highlighting the suffering of front-line workers through familiar experiences relating to the body and family connections, this article argues that these narratives enabled inter-subjective connections between the front-line workers and the rest of the population and, therefore, helped foster a feeling of solidarity among the population in controlling the virus. The descriptions about the practices of front-line workers in the quarantined areas and their social moral meaning also functioned as action models and explanatory frameworks for the public to rationalize and assign meaning to the behaviour required of them during the lockdown period, and thus encouraged a shared commitment to combating the virus. Thus, the Chongqing Daily narratives strengthened the social cohesion in Chongqing and helped unite the population for a total war against the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zou, 2021. "Fostering Solidarity and Encouraging Shared Commitment: Chongqing Daily’s Narratives about the Front-line Workers and the Role of these Narratives in Containing Covid-19," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(6), pages 794-804, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:29:y:2021:i:6:p:794-804_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798720001362/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:29:y:2021:i:6:p:794-804_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.