IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v26y2018i04p721-737_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Additionality of European Cohesion Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Å lander, Sonja
  • Wostner, Peter

Abstract

Is cohesion policy effective? Does it contribute to the reduction of development disparities and strengthen competitiveness in the European Union? These are the questions that have inspired a growing body of research on cohesion policy evaluation, and which has come to varied and inconclusive results. There has been significant variation with regards to the established (in)effectiveness of cohesion policy among different methodological approaches, which all have serious methodological shortcomings. In order to circumvent these, the authors have not only continued to rely on rigorous econometric methods but also focused on the potential benefits through an indirect estimation approach. They have confirmed that cohesion policy is de facto additional, i.e. that it effectively increases the structural expenditures of the recipient Member States, which, given the evidence on fiscal multiplier, should lead to stronger growth performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Å lander, Sonja & Wostner, Peter, 2018. "Additionality of European Cohesion Policy," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 721-737, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:26:y:2018:i:04:p:721-737_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798718000339/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Corti & Daniel Gros & Tomas Ruiz & Alessandro Liscai & Tamas Kiss-Galfalvi & David Gstrein & Elena Herold & Mathias Dolls & Clemens Fuest, 2022. "The European Added Value of the Recovery and Resilience Facility," EconPol Policy Reports 39, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:26:y:2018:i:04:p:721-737_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.