IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v21y2013i01p103-117_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European ‘Dis-integration’ in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Critical Reflection on Legal, Administrative and Political Obstacles Affecting the Approximation of Chapters 23 and 24 of the Acquis Communautaire

Author

Listed:
  • Roccia, Marco

Abstract

Several pieces of legislation have been enacted with a view to regulating the European integration process in Bosnia and Herzegovina. A plethora of bodies are in charge for approximating the EU acquis. However, the stabilisation and association process in the field of justice related matters has not proceeded as planned due to the existence of at least four legislatures for the Justice Sector and 14 Ministries of Justice (MoJs) whose competences and tasks are not well delineated. This article focuses on the specific issues affecting the transposition of Chapters 23 (Judiciary and fundamental rights) and 24 (Justice, freedom and security) of the EU acquis. Based on the analysis of existing legislation and administrative structures and meetings with local officials and foreign donors, the author argues how, for an effective legal approximation process, a review of the current allocation of competences among State, Entities, BrÄ ko District and canton level cannot wait. After drawing comparisons with regional best practices in the field of European integration and illustrating the complex constitutional framework of the country, the administrative and legislative obstacles characterising the approximation of domestic legislation with European standards in the field of Justice and Home affairs are explained. The author concludes by offering a set of solutions to overcome the current situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Roccia, Marco, 2013. "European ‘Dis-integration’ in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Critical Reflection on Legal, Administrative and Political Obstacles Affecting the Approximation of Chapters 23 and 24 of the Acquis Communa," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 103-117, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:21:y:2013:i:01:p:103-117_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798712000245/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:21:y:2013:i:01:p:103-117_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.