IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v19y2011i01p57-67_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China, the EU, and the New Multipolarity

Author

Listed:
  • Geeraerts, Gustaaf

Abstract

The world within which the EU and China have to deal with each other is changing. The unipolar moment is definitely fading and slowly giving way to an international system characterized by multilayered and culturally diversified polarity. This development has far-reaching consequences for the EU–China relationship; the more so since the EU and China have distinctive identities and define their value preferences differently. China is no longer the developing country it once was and is becoming more assertive by the day. Beijing is at the head of the world’s most successful economy and will weigh more and more heavily on global governance.1 Three decades of impressive economic growth have boosted the self-confidence of the Chinese leaders significantly. In Beijing, the notion that China should start taking on an attitude befitting a great power is gaining ground. China is taking up ever more space within various multilateral organizations and is setting up diplomatic activities throughout the globe. Moreover, Beijing has become more active in setting up its own multilateral channels to further its national interests and own norms. China no longer considers itself an outsider that should crawl back into its shell and steer clear of a global political system dominated by the West. All this puts into question the EU’s conditional policy towards China, which is based on the assumption that China can be socialized and persuaded to incorporate Europe’s post-modern values. The way ahead seems to be for Europe to opt for a more pragmatic approach, which takes stock of the changes in the underlying power and identity relations between the EU and China. The analysis of this paper will be developed at three levels. First, it examines the changes in the structure of international politics. To what kind of structure are we evolving and where do China and the EU fit in? Second, it takes a closer look at the respective identities of China and the EU and explicates the major differences between them. Finally, this study appraises the implications of the emerging multilayered and culturally diversified polarity for the further development of the EU–China relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Geeraerts, Gustaaf, 2011. "China, the EU, and the New Multipolarity," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 57-67, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:19:y:2011:i:01:p:57-67_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798710000335/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silvia Menegazzi, 2017. "Global Economic Governance between China and the EU: the case of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 229-242, June.
    2. Gustaaf Geeraerts, 2019. "The EU-China partnership: balancing between divergence and convergence," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 281-294, September.
    3. Feng Renjie, 2018. "Book Review: Diarmuid Torney, European Climate Leadership in Question: Policies Toward China and India," International Studies, , vol. 55(2), pages 194-197, April.
    4. Dradin Romain, 2023. "Navigating Complexities: The Eu's Perceptions Of China's Role In The Ukrainian Conflict And Implications For The Eu-China Relationship," HSE Working papers WP BRP 43/IR/2023, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:19:y:2011:i:01:p:57-67_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.