IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v4y1988i02p187-209_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Econometric Methodology at the Cowles Commission: Rise and Maturity

Author

Listed:
  • Malinvaud, E.

Abstract

Considering the contribution of the Cowles research institute to the development of econometrics, one has little choice in this address and must mainly focus attention on one major achievement, namely, the building of the simultaneous equation methodology. One does not need to demonstrate the indisputable fact that this methodology was conceived and elaborated at the Cowles Commission in the forties. Neither does one need to insist on the long standing significance of this achievement nor on its central place in any education or reflection concerning statistical inference about economic phenomena. More interesting is the question of how research at Cowles during the first 15 years of its existence led to this result and how further econometric research here during the last 30 years relates to the simultaneous equation achievement. Also relevant is the following question: how does the message that was sent out by the Cowles people to the world in 1950 stand today? Should it be replaced by another different one? Or should it simply be somewhat amended and supplemented?To do full justice to the research work and achievements of the many econometricians that were associated with Cowles through the years would require a much longer paper than the present one. But one must at least try also to summarize here those main concerns that stood outside the simultaneous equation methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Malinvaud, E., 1988. "Econometric Methodology at the Cowles Commission: Rise and Maturity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 187-209, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:4:y:1988:i:02:p:187-209_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466600012020/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. André Lapidus, 2020. "Why are philosophers more often right than others ? David Hume and general rules [David Hume et les règles générales : Pourquoi les philosophes ont-ils plus raison que les autres ?]," Post-Print hal-01714256, HAL.
    2. Sandra J. Peart, 2020. "On fallibility and perfection: Boettke’s Hayek vs. mainline economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 271-276, March.
    3. David F. Hendry, 2020. "A Short History of Macro-econometric Modelling," Economics Papers 2020-W01, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    4. Bjerkholt,O., 2001. "Tracing Haavelmo's steps from confluence analysis to the probability approach," Memorandum 25/2001, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    5. Rahmanov, Ramiz, 2014. "A Historical Sketch of Macroeconometrics," MPRA Paper 56869, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. André Lapidus, 2018. "Why are philosophers more often right than others ? David Hume and general rules [Pourquoi les philosophes ont-ils plus raison que les autres ? David Hume et les règles générales]," Working Papers hal-01714256, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:4:y:1988:i:02:p:187-209_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.