IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v41y2025i5p1163-1195_5.html

From Model Selection To Model Averaging: A Comparison For Nested Linear Models

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Wenchao
  • Zhang, Xinyu

Abstract

Model selection (MS) and model averaging (MA) are two popular approaches when many candidate models exist. Theoretically, the estimation risk of an oracle MA is not larger than that of an oracle MS because the former is more flexible, but a foundational issue is this: Does MA offer a substantial improvement over MS? Recently, seminal work by Peng and Yang (2022) has answered this question under nested models with linear orthonormal series expansion. In the current paper, we further respond to this question under linear nested regression models. A more general nested framework, heteroscedastic and autocorrelated random errors, and sparse coefficients are allowed in the current paper, giving a scenario that is more common in practice. A remarkable implication is that MS can be significantly improved by MA under certain conditions. In addition, we further compare MA techniques with different weight sets. Simulation studies illustrate the theoretical findings in a variety of settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Wenchao & Zhang, Xinyu, 2025. "From Model Selection To Model Averaging: A Comparison For Nested Linear Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(5), pages 1163-1195, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:41:y:2025:i:5:p:1163-1195_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466624000355/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:41:y:2025:i:5:p:1163-1195_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.