IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v41y2025i3p660-687_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Nonparametric Test Of Heterogeneity In Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Cai, Zongwu
  • Fang, Ying
  • Lin, Ming
  • Tang, Shengfang

Abstract

This paper proposes a nonparametric test to assess whether there exist heterogeneous quantile treatment effects (QTEs) of an intervention on the outcome of interest across different sub-populations defined by covariates of interest. Specifically, a consistent test statistic based on the Cramér–von Mises type criterion is developed to test if the treatment has a constant quantile effect for all sub-populations defined by covariates of interest. Under some regularity conditions, the asymptotic behaviors of the proposed test statistic are investigated under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Furthermore, a nonparametric Bootstrap procedure is suggested to approximate the finite-sample null distribution of the proposed test; then, the asymptotic validity of the proposed Bootstrap test is theoretically justified. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate the power properties of the test in finite samples. Finally, the proposed testing approach is applied to investigate whether there exists heterogeneity for the QTE of maternal smoking during pregnancy on infant birth weight across different age groups of mothers.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai, Zongwu & Fang, Ying & Lin, Ming & Tang, Shengfang, 2025. "A Nonparametric Test Of Heterogeneity In Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 660-687, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:41:y:2025:i:3:p:660-687_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466624000045/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:41:y:2025:i:3:p:660-687_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.