IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v32y2016i06p1483-1522_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neyman’S C(Α) Test For Unobserved Heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Jiaying

Abstract

A unified framework is proposed for tests of unobserved heterogeneity in parametric statistic models based on Neyman’s C(α) approach. Such tests are irregular in the sense that the first order derivative of the log likelihood with respect to the heterogeneity parameter is identically zero, and consequently the conventional Fisher information about the parameter is zero. Nevertheless, local asymptotic optimality of the C(α) tests can be established via LeCam’s differentiability in quadratic mean and the limit experiment approach. This leads to local alternatives of order n −1/4 . The scalar case result is already familiar from existing literature and we extend it to the multidimensional case. The new framework reveals that certain regularity conditions commonly employed in earlier developments are unnecessary, i.e. the symmetry or third moment condition imposed on the heterogeneity distribution. Additionally, the limit experiment for the multidimensional case suggests modifications on existing tests for slope heterogeneity in cross sectional and panel data models that lead to power improvement. Since the C(α) framework is not restricted to the parametric model and the test statistics do not depend on the particular choice of the heterogeneity distribution, it is useful for a broad range of applications for testing parametric heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Jiaying, 2016. "Neyman’S C(Α) Test For Unobserved Heterogeneity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(6), pages 1483-1522, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:32:y:2016:i:06:p:1483-1522_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466615000249/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:32:y:2016:i:06:p:1483-1522_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.