Testing the Goodness of Fit of a Parametric Density Function by Kernel Method
Let F denote a distribution function defined on the probability space (Ω,null, P ), which is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure in R with probability density function f . Let f 0 (·,β) be a parametric density function that depends on an unknown p × 1 vector β. In this paper, we consider tests of the goodness-of-fit of f 0 (·,β) for f (·) for some β based on (i) the integrated squared difference between a kernel estimate of f (·) and the quasimaximum likelihood estimate of f 0 (·,β) denoted by I and (ii) the integrated squared difference between a kernel estimate of f (·) and the corresponding kernel smoothed estimate of f 0 (·, β) denoted by J . It is shown in this paper that the amount of smoothing applied to the data in constructing the kernel estimate of f (·) determines the form of the test statistic based on I . For each test developed, we also examine its asymptotic properties including consistency and the local power property. In particular, we show that tests developed in this paper, except the first one, are more powerful than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test under the sequence of local alternatives introduced in Rosenblatt , although they are less powerful than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test under the sequence of Pitman alternatives. A small simulation study is carried out to examine the finite sample performance of one of these tests.
Volume (Year): 10 (1994)
Issue (Month): 02 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK|
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_ECT
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:10:y:1994:i:02:p:316-356_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.