IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ereveh/v4y2000i01p85-110_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 1935 Sanctions against Italy: Would coal and oil have made a difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Ristuccia, Cristiano Andrea

Abstract

This article assesses the hypothesis that the implementation of sanctions on the export of coal and oil products to Italy by the League of Nations in 1935–36 would have forced Italy to abandon her imperialistic war against Ethiopia. An analysis of the data on coal consumption in the industrial census of 1937–38 shows that Italian industry would have survived a League embargo on coal, provided that Germany continued her supply to Italy. However, the counterfactual on oil and oil derivatives proves that Italy was vulnerable to an oil embargo which included oil residuals (the main input for the petrochemical industries using oil cracking as a refining method), and fuel oil. Therefore, a solitary attempt at such an embargo by the League could have been successful even with only a limited collaboration by the United States in the form of maintaining exports to Italy at ‘peacetime levels’ for each commodity embargoed by the League.

Suggested Citation

  • Ristuccia, Cristiano Andrea, 2000. "The 1935 Sanctions against Italy: Would coal and oil have made a difference?," European Review of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 85-110, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:ereveh:v:4:y:2000:i:01:p:85-110_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1361491600000150/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ereveh:v:4:y:2000:i:01:p:85-110_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ere .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.