IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/entsoc/v20y2019i03p533-574_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Becoming a Correspondent: The Foundations of New Merchant Relationships in Early Modern French Trade (1730–1820)

Author

Listed:
  • BARTOLOMEI, ARNAUD
  • LEMERCIER, CLAIRE
  • REBOLLEDO-DHUIN, VIERA
  • SOUGY, NADÈGE

Abstract

This article discusses the relational and rhetorical foundations of more than 300 first letters sent in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries by merchant or banking houses based in Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Americas to two prominent French firms: Roux Brothers and Greffulhe Montz & Cie. We used a quantitative analysis of qualitative aspects of first letters to go beyond the standard opposition between premodern personal exchanges and modern impersonal transactions. The expansion of commercial networks during the period under analysis is often believed to have relied on families and ethnic networks and on explicit recommendations worded in the formulas prescribed in merchant manuals. However, most first letters did not use such resources. In many cases, commercial operations began thanks to a mutual acquaintance but without a formal recommendation. This was in fact the norm in the eighteenth century—and an underestimated foundation of the expansion of European commercial networks. In the early nineteenth century, this norm became less prevalent: it was replaced by diverse relational and rhetorical strategies, from recommendations to prospective letters dispensing with any mention of relationships. Whether before or after 1800, the relational and rhetorical resources displayed in letters did not systematically influence the sender’s chances of becoming a correspondent; instead, they depended on the receiving firm’s commercial strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartolomei, Arnaud & Lemercier, Claire & Rebolledo-Dhuin, Viera & Sougy, Nadãˆge, 2019. "Becoming a Correspondent: The Foundations of New Merchant Relationships in Early Modern French Trade (1730–1820)," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 533-574, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:20:y:2019:i:03:p:533-574_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1467222718000885/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:20:y:2019:i:03:p:533-574_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eso .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.