IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/entsoc/v18y2017i03p536-565_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Law, Design, and Market Value: Lessons from the Cantilever Chair, 1929–1936

Author

Listed:
  • VOGELGSANG, TOBIAS

Abstract

The cantilever chair is both a modern classic and a tradable commodity. Iconic designs, such as those by Marcel Breuer, are part of museum collections and are being produced for the contemporary furniture market. Moreover, there are countless other variations of the cantilever principle on the market. This article explains the emergence of the upmarket segment for iconic designs through historical sources. The focus is on the role of intellectual property rights and their interaction with management, branding, and pricing activities in the early 1930s. The article establishes that legal and perceived authenticity of cantilever designs were necessary but not sufficient to establish the upmarket segment. A substantial premium could only be charged once customers revealed that they had a high willingness to pay for authentic furniture that was chrome-plated.

Suggested Citation

  • Vogelgsang, Tobias, 2017. "Law, Design, and Market Value: Lessons from the Cantilever Chair, 1929–1936," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 536-565, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:18:y:2017:i:03:p:536-565_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1467222716000471/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:18:y:2017:i:03:p:536-565_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eso .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.