IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/entsoc/v15y2014i04p849-884_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Hybrid Variety: Lessons in Nonmarket Coordination from the Business System in the Netherlands, 1950–2010

Author

Listed:
  • Touwen, Jeroen

Abstract

This article develops a historical perspective on the coordinated market economy of the Netherlands and explains why it opted for compartmentalized liberalization. Two related questions are addressed, studying the Netherlands as a case study of a Coordinated Market Economy (CME): to what extent can economic change be accommodated within one “type of capitalism†? And why do specific institutions change while others remain in place? Applying the criteria of “Varieties of Capitalism†I focus on the way the Dutch business system applied nonmarket coordination during the twentieth century. Drawing information from various subfields (business history, labor relations and welfare state studies), I review processes of change and postulate that coordination resulted in the adoption of market-oriented reform in clearly delineated areas. “Varieties of Capitalism†theory addresses the historical roots of institutional arrangements, but historical developments have been underexposed in the comparative capitalism-literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Touwen, Jeroen, 2014. "The Hybrid Variety: Lessons in Nonmarket Coordination from the Business System in the Netherlands, 1950–2010," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 849-884, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:15:y:2014:i:04:p:849-884_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S146722270001613X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:15:y:2014:i:04:p:849-884_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eso .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.