IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/entsoc/v14y2013i03p579-605_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Functioning of Bankruptcy Law and Practices in European Perspective (ca.1880–1913)

Author

Listed:
  • Hautcoeur, Pierre-Cyrille
  • Di Martino, Paolo

Abstract

A growing body of research in economics and in business and economic history has shown the key role of bankruptcy and insolvency law on business organization, firms’ governance, and entrepreneurial choices. Most research, however, has focused on the formal aspects of laws, and still little is known on how various systems worked in practices. This paper fills this gap in the literature analyzing the functioning of bankruptcy procedures in four main European economies (Italy, France, England, and Germany) between ca.1880 and 1914. Using an original data set and descriptive statistics on length, organization, and return of procedures, the paper shows how the aim of attracting debtors was more successful in the less regulated English system, but how the protection of creditors’ rights was more efficiently pursued in France and Germany. Italy appears as the absolute worst performer.

Suggested Citation

  • Hautcoeur, Pierre-Cyrille & Di Martino, Paolo, 2013. "The Functioning of Bankruptcy Law and Practices in European Perspective (ca.1880–1913)," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 579-605, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:14:y:2013:i:03:p:579-605_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1467222700001609/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johan Eklund & Nadine Levratto & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and failure: two sides of the same coin?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 373-382, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:14:y:2013:i:03:p:579-605_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eso .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.