IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v31y2026i4p393-422_5.html

Farmers’ willingness to accept compensation to control agricultural nonpoint source pollution: the Limpopo River Basin of South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Apio, Alfred Tunyire
  • Thiam, Djiby Racine
  • Dinar, Ariel
  • Meyerhoff, Jürgen

Abstract

Different farmers require different compensation payments to be incentivized to participate in water quality improvement-related agri-environmental schemes (AESs) and payment for ecosystem services (PESs). This is because they differ in their farm management practices, cost structures and attitudinal characteristics. However, these differences are rarely characterized in the design and implementation of AESs and PESs in the Global South. Using a discrete choice experiment, we investigate farmers’ willingness to accept compensation to control agricultural nonpoint source pollution in the Limpopo River Basin of South Africa to observe whether these differences matter. Conditional, random parameter and latent class logit models are estimated. Our latent class logit model identified one random choice class (farmers making random responses) and three preference classes of farmers (low-, moderate- and high-resistance) with dissimilar compensation requirements to alter their status quo farm management practices to improve water quality. Gender, age, education, farming experience and secure tenure rights are key drivers of preference heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Apio, Alfred Tunyire & Thiam, Djiby Racine & Dinar, Ariel & Meyerhoff, Jürgen, 2026. "Farmers’ willingness to accept compensation to control agricultural nonpoint source pollution: the Limpopo River Basin of South Africa," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 393-422, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:31:y:2026:i:4:p:393-422_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X25100168/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:31:y:2026:i:4:p:393-422_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.