IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v31y2026i2-3p210-235_7.html

Can large-scale technology raise small-miner income and reduce mercury? Prospects for female waste-rock collectors selling ore to non-mercury processing plants

Author

Listed:
  • Tobin, Danny
  • Pfaff, Alexander
  • Monroy, Dayron
  • Salgado-Almeida, Bryan
  • Kiefer, Adam M.
  • Garces, Daniel

Abstract

Artisanal-and-small-scale gold mining supports millions of livelihoods in the Global South but is the largest anthropogenic source of mercury emissions. Many initiatives promote mercury-free technologies that small miners could employ. Few document mercury impacts. We study an alternative: instead of processing themselves, small miners sell their ore to plants employing larger-scale, mercury-free technologies that also raise gold yields. Some ore-selling occurs without policy intervention, yet impacts on incomes and mercury use remain unclear. We assess ore-selling preferences of female waste-rock collectors (jancheras) in Ecuador, using a discrete-choice experiment. Results demonstrate that jancheras generally are open to ore-selling, yet often reject options similar to a recent pilot intervention. Offers that address formalization hurdles (invoicing), inabilities to meet quantity minima (given limits upon association, storage, and credit), and constraints on trust (including in plants’ ore testing) could increase adoption by tailoring related interventions to the preferences of and challenges for defined populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobin, Danny & Pfaff, Alexander & Monroy, Dayron & Salgado-Almeida, Bryan & Kiefer, Adam M. & Garces, Daniel, 2026. "Can large-scale technology raise small-miner income and reduce mercury? Prospects for female waste-rock collectors selling ore to non-mercury processing plants," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2-3), pages 210-235, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:31:y:2026:i:2-3:p:210-235_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X2510017X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:31:y:2026:i:2-3:p:210-235_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.