IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v30y2025i6p442-459_2.html

Testing Kuznets’ environmental hypothesis for the Legal Amazon: a nonlinear approach

Author

Listed:
  • Souza, Helson
  • Barbosa, Gerrio

Abstract

This study tests the null hypothesis that no significant differences exist in the relationship between economic growth and deforestation, based on the levels of growth and agricultural productivity in the municipalities of the Brazilian Legal Amazon. Grounded in the environmental Kuznets curve theory, this study employs a non-linear methodological approach to estimate the relationship between economic growth and deforestation. The results reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the relationship between growth and deforestation varies with the municipalities’ productive performance. Furthermore, the findings conclude that a negative monotonic relationship exists between economic growth and deforestation in the Brazilian Legal Amazon, suggesting that reductions in deforestation are achievable even during periods of economic expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Souza, Helson & Barbosa, Gerrio, 2025. "Testing Kuznets’ environmental hypothesis for the Legal Amazon: a nonlinear approach," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(6), pages 442-459, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:30:y:2025:i:6:p:442-459_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X25000063/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:30:y:2025:i:6:p:442-459_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.