IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v30y2025i4p315-338_4.html

Can abatement efforts in a common pool resource promote overexploitation of the resource?

Author

Listed:
  • Surve, Aditi A.
  • Espinola-Arredondo, Ana

Abstract

We examine a common pool resource (CPR) where appropriations deteriorate the quality of the resource and, thus, its impact on the exploitation of the CPR. We focus on two settings: (i) firms use the CPR without abatement efforts, and (ii) abatement is allowed. We provide comparisons between these two settings and identify socially optimal appropriation levels. We find that (i) higher quality of the CPR could induce firms to overuse the resource, and (ii) first-period appropriations with abatement decrease in the regeneration rate. However, abatement induces an overuse of the resource when the quality of the CPR improves.

Suggested Citation

  • Surve, Aditi A. & Espinola-Arredondo, Ana, 2025. "Can abatement efforts in a common pool resource promote overexploitation of the resource?," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 315-338, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:30:y:2025:i:4:p:315-338_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X2400038X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:30:y:2025:i:4:p:315-338_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.