IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v26y2021i4p403-428_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing policies to mitigate abandonment of shade-grown coffee production in forest systems amid low and uncertain prices

Author

Listed:
  • Albers, Heidi J.
  • Brockmann, Stephanie
  • Ávalos-Sartorio, Beatriz

Abstract

Low and highly variable prices plague the coffee market, generating concerns that coffee farmers producing in shade systems under natural forests, as in biodiversity hotspot Oaxaca, Mexico, will abandon production and contribute to deforestation and reduced ecosystem services. Using stakeholder information, we build a setting-informed model to analyze farmers' decisions to abandon shade-grown coffee production and their reactions to policy to reduce abandonment. Exploring price premiums for bird-friendly certified coffee, payments for ecosystem services, and price floors as policies, we find that once a farmer is on the path toward abandonment, it is difficult to reverse. However, implementing policies early that are low cost to farmers – price floors and no-cost certification programs – can stem abandonment. Considering the abandonment that policy avoids per dollar spent, price floors are the most cost-effective policy, yet governments prefer certification programs that push costs onto international coffee consumers who pay the price premium.

Suggested Citation

  • Albers, Heidi J. & Brockmann, Stephanie & Ávalos-Sartorio, Beatriz, 2021. "Assessing policies to mitigate abandonment of shade-grown coffee production in forest systems amid low and uncertain prices," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 403-428, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:26:y:2021:i:4:p:403-428_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X20000443/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:26:y:2021:i:4:p:403-428_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.