IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ecnphi/v42y2026i2p244-279_2.html

Angels and devils on our shoulders: a framework for modelling moral agency

Author

Listed:
  • Gouri Suresh, Shyam
  • Studtmann, Paul

Abstract

We present a philosophically motivated framework for modelling moral agency. In addition to choosing strategies, agents in this framework choose among an appropriate exogenous set of moralities that depends on the context of the game. Further, agents can use mixed strategies to choose their degree of morality. We present two models to demonstrate the framework. In the first model, agents choose between empathy and selfishness while playing prisoner’s dilemma. In the second, agents choose between Kantian universalizing and selfishness while playing a public goods game. For both models, the degree of morality gets determined endogenously rather than assigned parametrically.

Suggested Citation

  • Gouri Suresh, Shyam & Studtmann, Paul, 2026. "Angels and devils on our shoulders: a framework for modelling moral agency," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 244-279, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:244-279_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266267125100448/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:244-279_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.