IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ecnphi/v39y2023i1p67-98_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibration dilemmas in the ethics of distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Nebel, Jacob M.
  • Stefánsson, H. Orri

Abstract

This paper presents a new kind of problem in the ethics of distribution. The problem takes the form of several ‘calibration dilemmas’, in which intuitively reasonable aversion to small-stakes inequalities requires leading theories of distribution to recommend intuitively unreasonable aversion to large-stakes inequalities. We first lay out a series of such dilemmas for prioritarian theories. We then consider a widely endorsed family of egalitarian views and show that they are subject to even more forceful calibration dilemmas than prioritarian theories. Finally, we show that our results challenge common utilitarian accounts of the badness of inequalities in resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Nebel, Jacob M. & Stefánsson, H. Orri, 2023. "Calibration dilemmas in the ethics of distribution," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 67-98, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:39:y:2023:i:1:p:67-98_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266267121000298/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:39:y:2023:i:1:p:67-98_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.