IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ecnphi/v38y2022i3p416-449_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respecting equality in economic option appraisal: valuing the time of your life

Author

Listed:
  • Franklin, Donald

Abstract

Even where willingness-to-pay as a measure of welfare impact is adjusted for diminishing marginal utility, welfare economics is shown to favour policies that add to the life expectancy or that enhance the quality of life of persons who are already better-off. I propose an alternative, Equal Respect methodology, under an axiomatic claim that at the point of decision the prospective life years of all individuals are of equal intrinsic social value. This justifies equal valuation of risk mitigation across all persons; similarly, all appraised impacts should be scaled to accord equal respect to difficult but no-less-valuable lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Franklin, Donald, 2022. "Respecting equality in economic option appraisal: valuing the time of your life," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 416-449, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:38:y:2022:i:3:p:416-449_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266267122000128/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:38:y:2022:i:3:p:416-449_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.