IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhurj/v8y2023i1p18-42_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentring Narratives around Business and Human Rights Instruments: An Example of the French Devoir de Vigilance Law

Author

Listed:
  • Bose, Debadatta

Abstract

There has been tremendous momentum in adoption of business and human rights regulations, specifically national legislation that mandate human rights due diligence. While these laws have been heralded as the torchbearers of progress, this article approaches national legislation on business and human rights by placing them in context of a North–South divide through a Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) lens. It looks at the form of regulation of transnational corporations (national/international) – not the substance – and illustrates the neo-colonial flavour of these laws by diving into the narrative behind the adoption of the French devoir de vigilance law. It illustrates that the French law can also be read as an attempt to universalise European values while reinforcing power hierarchies. The claim of this article is that national legislation cannot be a substitute for a treaty but only a path towards one, because national legislation structurally lacks means to take the Global South participation seriously.

Suggested Citation

  • Bose, Debadatta, 2023. "Decentring Narratives around Business and Human Rights Instruments: An Example of the French Devoir de Vigilance Law," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 18-42, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:8:y:2023:i:1:p:18-42_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2057019823000068/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:8:y:2023:i:1:p:18-42_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.