IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhurj/v8y2023i1p1-17_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Muddying the Waters: The Concept of a ‘Safe Harbour’ in Understanding Human Rights Due Diligence

Author

Listed:
  • Smit, Lise
  • Bright, Claire
  • Neely, Stuart

Abstract

The concept of a ‘safe harbour’ has been mentioned in several contexts during ongoing discussions around regulatory developments towards mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence (mHREDD) which continue at international, European and national levels. This article analyses the concept of a ‘safe harbour’ and how it relates to human rights due diligence (HRDD) as described in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). It discusses examples of other types of safe harbours which were recognized in legislation and case law; considers that a safe harbour could result in a ‘tick-box’ approach; highlights the implications for access to remedy; and distinguishes a safe harbour exemption from a defence of having undertaken HRDD in accordance with an expected standard of conduct.

Suggested Citation

  • Smit, Lise & Bright, Claire & Neely, Stuart, 2023. "Muddying the Waters: The Concept of a ‘Safe Harbour’ in Understanding Human Rights Due Diligence," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:8:y:2023:i:1:p:1-17_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2057019822000402/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:8:y:2023:i:1:p:1-17_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.