IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhurj/v5y2020i1p1-27_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate Change as a Business and Human Rights Issue: A Proposal for a Moral Typology

Author

Listed:
  • TOFT, Kristian Høyer

Abstract

To explore the emerging and contested issue of business and human rights in the area of climate change, this article provides a critical discussion from the viewpoint of moral philosophy. A novel typology of businesses’ human rights duties (‘duty’ is considered synonymous with ‘responsibility’ here) is proposed. It claims that duties are both forward- and backward-looking. Cases of human rights litigation seeking remedy for climate-related harms are backward-looking, and duties should be determined on the basis of proportion of historical emissions, culpable knowledge and counter-acts to abate climate harms. Businesses’ forward-looking duties, however, depend on their power, privilege, interest and collective abilities. The typology is then assessed against the background of recent legal principles and instruments. It is concluded that moral duties of business reach beyond mere respect for human rights and national jurisdictions in the context of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • TOFT, Kristian Høyer, 2020. "Climate Change as a Business and Human Rights Issue: A Proposal for a Moral Typology," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:1-27_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2057019819000221/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiara Macchi & Nadia Bernaz, 2021. "Business, Human Rights and Climate Due Diligence: Understanding the Responsibility of Banks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:1-27_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.