IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhurj/v1y2016i02p179-202_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outlining the Case for a Common Law Duty of Care of Business to Exercise Human Rights Due Diligence

Author

Listed:
  • CASSEL, Doug

Abstract

This article outlines the case for a business duty of care to exercise human rights due diligence, judicially enforceable in common law countries by tort suits for negligence brought by persons whose potential injuries were reasonably foreseeable. A parent company’s duty of care would extend to the human rights impacts of all entities in the enterprise, including subsidiaries. A company would not be liable for breach of the duty of care if it proves that it reasonably exercised due diligence as set forth in the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. On the other hand, a company’s failure to exercise due diligence would create a rebuttable presumption of causation and hence liability. A company could then avoid liability only by carrying its burden to prove that the risk of the human rights violations was not reasonably foreseeable, or that the damages would have resulted even if the company had exercised due diligence.

Suggested Citation

  • CASSEL, Doug, 2016. "Outlining the Case for a Common Law Duty of Care of Business to Exercise Human Rights Due Diligence," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 179-202, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:1:y:2016:i:02:p:179-202_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2057019816000158/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:1:y:2016:i:02:p:179-202_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.