IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhurj/v10y2025i1p260-266_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Litigating Climate Justice in Renewable Energy Projects: Reflections from Unión Hidalgo v EDF

Author

Listed:
  • Bailey, Chloé
  • Lavite, Cannelle

Abstract

Reflecting on the civil claim filed in France under the French Duty of Vigilance law (LdV) by members of the Union Hidalgo community in Mexico against the energy company Electricité de France (EDF), this article explores interactions between human rights due diligence in renewable energy projects. The lawsuit is one of the first cases brought under the LdV, and the first case claiming violations of Indigenous rights. The rights violations experienced by the community—the lack of free, prior and informed consent and violence against human rights defenders—epitomize the reality of harmful corporate tactics in the energy and extractive industries. Whereas the LdV enshrines a process through which communities affected by harmful corporate practices can access transnational legal avenues for redress, inconsistencies and ambiguities within the law call into question its ability to effectively regulate the human rights activities of French corporations involved in renewable energy projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Bailey, Chloé & Lavite, Cannelle, 2025. "Litigating Climate Justice in Renewable Energy Projects: Reflections from Unión Hidalgo v EDF," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 260-266, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:260-266_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2057019825000185/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:260-266_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.