IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v97y2023i2p283-305_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pharmaceutical Captivity, Epistemological Rupture, and the Business Archive of the British Slave Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts, Carolyn

Abstract

The archival record of the transatlantic slave trade poses a methodological challenge to researchers who wish to center the lives of enslaved people in their scholarship. In more recent years, such archival scrutiny has evolved into its own vibrant field of inquiry concerning the politics of the archive. This article contributes to this burgeoning field by studying the pharmaceutical dimensions of the British slave trade and examining the underexplored relationship between captivity and drugs that articulated across the Atlantic world. By performing three different readings of a slave ship drug invoice—as a textual artifact, epistemic argument, and narrative of loss—I argue that the drug invoice stimulates new illness narratives of captive Africans in the historiography of the British slave trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts, Carolyn, 2023. "Pharmaceutical Captivity, Epistemological Rupture, and the Business Archive of the British Slave Trade," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(2), pages 283-305, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:97:y:2023:i:2:p:283-305_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680523000326/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:97:y:2023:i:2:p:283-305_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.