IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v94y2020i1p201-228_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Port of Trade or Commodity Market? Livorno and Cross-Cultural Trade in the Early Modern Mediterranean

Author

Listed:
  • Tazzara, Corey

Abstract

This article critiques the application of Karl Polanyi's port of trade model to the development of Livorno, which has often been ascribed to commercial brokerage across cultural, political, and ecological frontiers. Livorno's neutrality during times of war and its position in the corsair and privateering economies would appear to support just such an interpretation of Livorno's growth. Nevertheless, while such interstitial roles were real, by the 1640s they were subordinate to the larger currents of regional and long-distance trade. Livorno's development is better explained with reference to the rise of commodity markets as entrepôts for managing far-flung distribution networks. The Tuscan port's rapid rise should be understood as an integral phenomenon of early modern capitalism, more akin to places such as London or Amsterdam than to the ports of trade studied by Polanyi.

Suggested Citation

  • Tazzara, Corey, 2020. "Port of Trade or Commodity Market? Livorno and Cross-Cultural Trade in the Early Modern Mediterranean," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(1), pages 201-228, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:94:y:2020:i:1:p:201-228_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000768051900120X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:94:y:2020:i:1:p:201-228_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.