IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v86y2012i01p99-122_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operations Research vis-Ã -vis Management at Arthur D. Little and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the 1950s

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas, William

Abstract

This article examines the establishment of the field of operations research (OR) at the Arthur D. Little consulting firm and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. OR advocates envisioned the field as a new kind of bureaucratic organ dedicated to general studies of business problems, staffed by trained scientists who could employ sophisticated methods if needed. The crux of their promotional strategy was to use their appreciation of general managerial practice to overcome the tensions to be expected from their claims to apply generic scientific methods to nonscientific activities. However, they discounted possible intellectual competition with established professions. This competition ultimately confined OR's identity to a jurisdiction defined by novel mathematical techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas, William, 2012. "Operations Research vis-Ã -vis Management at Arthur D. Little and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the 1950s," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(1), pages 99-122, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:86:y:2012:i:01:p:99-122_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680512000050/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:86:y:2012:i:01:p:99-122_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.