IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v50y1976i03p329-355_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pressure from Leadenhall: The East India Company Lobby, 1660–1678

Author

Listed:
  • Sherman, Arnold A.

Abstract

Dramatic evidence of the vital role played by the British East India Company in Britain's rise to preeminence in world trade is revealed in the intimate relations between the Company, Parliament, and Charles II. Britain needed an agency for pressing the struggle against the resourceful Dutch, and the King needed revenue. The Company needed assurance in the form of a charter that its existence would be continuous; Navigation Acts to give meaning to its trading monopoly; laws against “interlopers†in its trading areas; and relief from mercantilist prejudices so that it could buy for cash where British goods were not in demand. Government and Company provided each other with all these, in a pragmatic arrangement that overrode prejudices and political sensitivities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherman, Arnold A., 1976. "Pressure from Leadenhall: The East India Company Lobby, 1660–1678," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 329-355, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:50:y:1976:i:03:p:329-355_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680500020237/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gijs Rommelse, 2010. "The role of mercantilism in Anglo‐Dutch political relations, 1650–74," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 63(3), pages 591-611, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:50:y:1976:i:03:p:329-355_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.