IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v8y1998is1p109-122_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons from the Wreck of the Exxon Valdez: The Need for Imagination, Empathy and Courage

Author

Listed:
  • Hosmer, Larue T.

Abstract

Investigations of large scale industrial accidents generally take one of two alternative approaches to identifying the cause or causes of those destructive events. The first is legal analysis, which focuses on the mechanical failure or human error that immediately preceded the accident. The second is socio-technical reasoning, which centers on the complexities of the interlocking technological and organizational systems that brought about the accident. Both are retrospective, and provide little insight into the means of avoiding industrial accidents in the future. This article looks at six levels of managerial responsibility within a firm, and suggests specific changes at all levels that should logically help in the prevention or mitigation of these high impact/low probability events. The most basic need, however, is for imagination, empathy, and courage at the most senior level of the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Hosmer, Larue T., 1998. "Lessons from the Wreck of the Exxon Valdez: The Need for Imagination, Empathy and Courage," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(S1), pages 109-122, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:8:y:1998:i:s1:p:109-122_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00400102/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:8:y:1998:i:s1:p:109-122_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.