IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v36y2026i2p185-213_1.html

Practice, Reason, and the Good: Human Nature and MacIntyrean Business Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Bernacchio, Caleb
  • Sinnicks, Matthew

Abstract

MacIntyrean business ethics research has focused on the concept of a practice, drawn primarily from After Virtue. MacIntyre later emphasized the need to adopt an account of human nature to provide a better grounding for his earlier social teleology. We consider three implications of incorporating the neo-Aristotelian and Thomistic account of human nature outlined in MacIntyre’s later works for MacIntyrean business ethics research: First, this account enables the MacIntyrean perspective to better ground its focus on practices as a key moral requirement for the organization of work. Second, it provides a better basis for distinguishing productive practices in good order from other business activities lacking the characteristics of a practice. Third, a theory incorporating an account of human nature, particularly MacIntyre’s notion of natural law, is better able to address broader questions in business ethics that are not directly concerned with the structure of work.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernacchio, Caleb & Sinnicks, Matthew, 2026. "Practice, Reason, and the Good: Human Nature and MacIntyrean Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 185-213, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:185-213_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X25100766/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:185-213_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.