IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v35y2025i4p675-705_8.html

Organized Carelessness: De-ethicizing the Organization of Death

Author

Listed:
  • Wenzel, Matthias

Abstract

Death elicits needs such as an adequate farewell. Attending and responding to such needs is central to the organization of death, that is, the management of end-of-life situations before, during, and after a person’s passing. However, prior research points to insensitivity and marginalization of such needs in the organization of death. I refer to this phenomenon as “organized carelessness,” and I draw on the ethics of care to examine how it is produced. Based on a case study in the field of funeral services, I show how organized carelessness emerges through four processes: sequestration, deauthorization, reskilling, and moralization. Together, these processes contribute to stripping away ethical choices in relationships with the bereaved, and moving forward with little, if any, sensitivity and responses to their specific needs for an adequate farewell. These findings have implications for understanding carelessness in the organization of death in particular, and in organizational life more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenzel, Matthias, 2025. "Organized Carelessness: De-ethicizing the Organization of Death," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 675-705, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:35:y:2025:i:4:p:675-705_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X25100833/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:35:y:2025:i:4:p:675-705_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.