IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v33y2023i4p732-762_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral Repair: Toward a Two-Level Conceptualization

Author

Listed:
  • Vives-Gabriel, Jordi
  • Van Lent, Wim
  • Wettstein, Florian

Abstract

Moral repair is an important way for firms to heal moral relationships with stakeholders following a transgression. The concept is rooted in recognition theory, which is often used to develop normative perspectives and prescriptions, but the same theory has also propelled a view of moral repair as premised on negotiation between offender and victim(s), which involves the complex social construction of the transgression and the appropriate amends. The tension between normative principles and socioconstructivist implementation begs the question how offending firms should approach moral repair. Addressing this question, we develop a two-level conceptualization of moral repair, distinguishing between procedural and substantive levels of practice, which accommodate normativity and socioconstructivism, respectively. In so doing, we enrich the literature by 1) promoting conceptual clarity, 2) refining understanding of the moral repair process, and 3) suggesting the use of a unified, configurational approach to studying (nonlinear) relations between amends and moral outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Vives-Gabriel, Jordi & Van Lent, Wim & Wettstein, Florian, 2023. "Moral Repair: Toward a Two-Level Conceptualization," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(4), pages 732-762, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:33:y:2023:i:4:p:732-762_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X22000069/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:33:y:2023:i:4:p:732-762_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.