IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v32y2022i1p75-102_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why a Right to an Explanation of Algorithmic Decision-Making Should Exist: A Trust-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Tae Wan
  • Routledge, Bryan R.

Abstract

Businesses increasingly rely on algorithms that are data-trained sets of decision rules (i.e., the output of the processes often called “machine learning”) and implement decisions with little or no human intermediation. In this article, we provide a philosophical foundation for the claim that algorithmic decision-making gives rise to a “right to explanation.” It is often said that, in the digital era, informed consent is dead. This negative view originates from a rigid understanding that presumes informed consent is a static and complete transaction. Such a view is insufficient, especially when data are used in a secondary, noncontextual, and unpredictable manner—which is the inescapable nature of advanced artificial intelligence systems. We submit that an alternative view of informed consent—as an assurance of trust for incomplete transactions—allows for an understanding of why the rationale of informed consent already entails a right to ex post explanation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Tae Wan & Routledge, Bryan R., 2022. "Why a Right to an Explanation of Algorithmic Decision-Making Should Exist: A Trust-Based Approach," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 75-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:32:y:2022:i:1:p:75-102_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X21000038/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:32:y:2022:i:1:p:75-102_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.