IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v7y2001i2p177-201_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Compliance with Professional Guidance Revisited. A Further Discussion Paper Prepared by the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

This second paper from the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board sets out the reasons for introducing peer review within the profession, and outlines the areas of professional difficulty identified. The main recommendation is that peer review by an actuary's colleagues in his firm should be carried out on all relevant work before presentation to the client (whether an internal or external client). The situations in which this practice would be mandatory are also set out and, initially, these will relate to mandatory guidance in practising certificate areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 2001. "Monitoring Compliance with Professional Guidance Revisited. A Further Discussion Paper Prepared by the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 177-201, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:7:y:2001:i:2:p:177-201_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S135732170000218X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:7:y:2001:i:2:p:177-201_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.