IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v7y2001i03p365-423_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transparent With-Profits — Freedom with Publicity

Author

Listed:
  • Clay, G.D.
  • Frankland, R.
  • Horn, A.D.
  • Hylands, J.F.
  • Johnson, C.M.
  • Kerry, R.A.
  • Lister, J.R.
  • Loseby, R.L.

Abstract

With-profits business has flourished for over a century as a means of providing access to equity-type investment whilst smoothing the volatility risk. Today's world demands greater transparency, and with-profits has come under increasing criticism in this regard. The Working Party concludes that it remains good value as an investment vehicle and suggests how its transparency can be significantly improved. The paper first analyses the characteristics of with-profits, which it notes has been permitted for stakeholder pensions. It then analyses the various criticisms of with-profits and considers how they can be rebutted without destroying its essential nature, pre-supposing the implementation of the Association of British Insurers' (ABI) Raising Standards scheme. The paper concludes that greater transparency is both necessary for rebuttal and also achievable without destroying the with-profits concept, to this end proposing a model for the internal analysis of identified classes of with-profits business and the inclusion of specified additional information in the statutory returns to the regulators. It also proposes that policyholders be given slightly more information than is specified under Raising Standards. Finally the paper analyses the implications for the life assurance industry, which it considers acceptable.

Suggested Citation

  • Clay, G.D. & Frankland, R. & Horn, A.D. & Hylands, J.F. & Johnson, C.M. & Kerry, R.A. & Lister, J.R. & Loseby, R.L., 2001. "Transparent With-Profits — Freedom with Publicity," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 365-423, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:7:y:2001:i:03:p:365-423_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321700002403/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:7:y:2001:i:03:p:365-423_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.