IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v31y2026ip-_17.html

Modelling climate-related mortality and morbidity risks in the UK: insights from a practitioner survey

Author

Listed:
  • Ofosu-Hene, Eric Dei
  • Carr, Peter
  • Harris, Jonathan
  • Morris, Richard
  • Tavener, Chris
  • Horvat-Gitsels, Lisanne

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a targeted survey conducted among UK pension consultancies, insurers and reinsurers to explore current actuarial practices and challenges in modelling the impact on mortality and morbidity of climate perils. The responses reveal several recurring themes, including varying degrees of climate risk integration, plus significant data and methodological limitations. This is against a background of growing regulatory and stakeholder pressure to incorporate climate considerations into actuarial models. While a small number of organisations have made substantive progress, many are at a preliminary stage, relying primarily on qualitative or scenario-based approaches. Respondents identified a pressing need for standardised methodologies, improved data sources and practical guidance to support consistent and credible modelling. The findings highlight a clear need for profession-led guidance, improved access to climate-health data and practical frameworks to support the consistent integration of climate-related mortality and morbidity risks into actuarial work. Respondents expressed strong support for collaborative development of standardised scenarios, illustrative modelling approaches and case studies to bridge the gap between public-health research and actuarial application. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for practitioners and identifies priority areas for future research and professional guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ofosu-Hene, Eric Dei & Carr, Peter & Harris, Jonathan & Morris, Richard & Tavener, Chris & Horvat-Gitsels, Lisanne, 2026. "Modelling climate-related mortality and morbidity risks in the UK: insights from a practitioner survey," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:31:y:2026:i::p:-_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321726100476/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:31:y:2026:i::p:-_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.