IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v30y2025ip-_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Report of the dynamic discount rates working party: key considerations for pension scheme funding

Author

Listed:
  • Connolly, G.
  • Dodd, A.
  • Fink, D.
  • Hardingham, P.
  • McIvor, K.
  • McCrossan, O.
  • Stratford-Higton, L.

Abstract

This report explores key considerations in relation to adopting a dynamic discount rate funding approach and the impacts of doing so in a range of areas, including funding volatility, investment strategy and end game objectives. It considers the advantages and disadvantages of this approach from the perspective of a range of stakeholders and the challenges that need overcoming in order to fully implement and support the approach, for example data challenges and the new skills required in the industry. The report includes sample modelling to highlight the practical issues that arise when adopting this approach. It describes a step-by-step approach for assessing the risks to be considered when determining an appropriate level of assets to provide funding for a sample set of pension scheme cash flows, as summarised in the table below. Steps involved in determining the funding buffer and discount rate Step 1 Create an asset portfolio based on best estimate liability cash flows Step 2 Adjustment for investment costs Step 3 Buffer: allowance for asset-side risks Step 4 Buffer: allowance for asset-liability mismatch risk (reinvestment and disinvestment risk) Step 5 Buffer: allowance for liability-side risks Step 6 Buffer: consideration of risk diversification when determining the buffer It also considers how a dynamic discount rate approach fits within the proposed future funding regulations. Finally, the report puts forward recommendations for the IFoA, Scheme Actuaries and TPR. Consequences of schemes adopting a dynamic discount rate approach could include very different investment strategies with investment in a wider pool of assets, less use of leveraged Liability Driven Investment, fewer schemes targeting buy-out as their end game strategy and an increase in technical work for actuaries in advising on the optimisation of asset and liability cash flows.

Suggested Citation

  • Connolly, G. & Dodd, A. & Fink, D. & Hardingham, P. & McIvor, K. & McCrossan, O. & Stratford-Higton, L., 2025. "Report of the dynamic discount rates working party: key considerations for pension scheme funding," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:30:y:2025:i::p:-_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321724000151/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:30:y:2025:i::p:-_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.