IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v30y2025ip-_36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequality – actuarial perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Babad, Yair
  • Billig, Assia
  • Gutterman, Sam

Abstract

Inequality is an inherent quality of society. This paper provides actuarial insights into the recognition, measurement, and consequences of inequality. Key underlying concepts are discussed, with an emphasis on the distinction between inequality of opportunity and inequality of outcome. To better design and maintain approaches and programmes that mitigate its adverse effects, it is important to understand its contributing causes. The paper outlines strategies for reflecting on and addressing inequality in actuarial practice. Actuaries are encouraged to work with policymakers, employers, providers, regulators, and individuals in the design and management of sustainable programmes to address some of the critical issues associated with inequality. These programmes can encourage more equal opportunities and protect against the adverse financial effects of outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Babad, Yair & Billig, Assia & Gutterman, Sam, 2025. "Inequality – actuarial perspectives," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:30:y:2025:i::p:-_36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321725100214/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:30:y:2025:i::p:-_36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.