IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v27y2022ip-_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Your reserves may be best estimate, but are they valid?

Author

Listed:
  • Diffey, William
  • Hobern, Laura
  • Lauder, Al
  • Cleugh, Malcolm
  • Wu, Mark
  • Mukherjee, Satraajeet
  • Dan, Apollos
  • Dharamshi, Param
  • Atwal, Rav
  • Vijay, Arun
  • Dolan, Fergal
  • Grewal, Amo
  • Harrison, Ed

Abstract

This paper outlines frameworks to use for reserving validation and gives the reader an overview of current techniques being employed. In the experience of the authors, many companies lack an embedded reserve validation framework and reserve validation can appear piecemeal and unstructured. The paper outlines a case study demonstrating how successful machine learning techniques will become and then goes on to discuss the implications of machine learning to the future of reserving departments, processes, data and validation techniques. Reserving validation can take many forms, from simple checks to full independent reviews to add value to the reserving process, enhance governance and increase confidence in and reliability in results. This paper discusses covers common weaknesses and their solutions and suggestions of a framework in which to apply validation tools. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on reserving validation is also covered as are early warning indicators and the topic of IFRS 17 from the standpoint of reserving validation. The paper looks at the future for reserving validation and discusses the data challenges that need overcoming on the path to embedded reserving process validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Diffey, William & Hobern, Laura & Lauder, Al & Cleugh, Malcolm & Wu, Mark & Mukherjee, Satraajeet & Dan, Apollos & Dharamshi, Param & Atwal, Rav & Vijay, Arun & Dolan, Fergal & Grewal, Amo & Harrison,, 2022. "Your reserves may be best estimate, but are they valid?," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:27:y:2022:i::p:-_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321721000179/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:27:y:2022:i::p:-_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.