IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v24y2019ip-_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recalculation of the Solvency II transitional measures on technical provisions

Author

Listed:
  • Cooke, J.
  • Scott, A.
  • Smith, D.
  • Rogan, A.
  • Cooper, R.
  • Morgan, S.
  • Plotnek, A.
  • Kenyon, N.
  • Bhalla, S.

Abstract

Solvency II came into force on 1 January 2016 and included a transitional measure on technical provisions (“TMTP”) designed to help smooth in the capital impact of Solvency II over a 16-year period. The working party’s view is that the main intention of the TMTP is to mitigate the impact of the introduction of the risk margin, which significantly increases the technical provisions of firms, relative to their Solvency I Pillar 2 liabilities. The majority of firms who hold a TMTP have now had at least one recalculation approved by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA); or are in the process of applying for a recalculation. Despite this large number of approved recalculations, there remains significant uncertainty in the industry around the approach and triggers for recalculation. This paper considers aspects of TMTP recalculation for regulated UK life firms, for example practicalities of the calculation, asset and liability considerations, and communications/announcements. In this paper, we outline the need for pragmatism when considering the approach to recalculation of a measure originally intended to serve as the bridge between two regimes. We call for an allowance for doing what is sensible in a principles-based regime balancing what might be more theoretically correct with what is practical and possible to support effective management of the business.

Suggested Citation

  • Cooke, J. & Scott, A. & Smith, D. & Rogan, A. & Cooper, R. & Morgan, S. & Plotnek, A. & Kenyon, N. & Bhalla, S., 2019. "Recalculation of the Solvency II transitional measures on technical provisions," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:24:y:2019:i::p:-_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321718000302/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:24:y:2019:i::p:-_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.